Write For Us

Submission Requirements

Please send your article in a word document along with the visuals to upadhyay.raj8[@]gmail[dot]com
The article must be submitted by a person and not a company.
Your bio should not be more than 2 or 3 lines long. You can give credit to your company in this bio by linking out to it.
Your visuals should not be more than 620 pixels wide.
We reserve the right to make some minor changes to grammar and visuals. But any major change (like change to the article headline) will be in agreement with the guest author.
Once the article is published on seotakeaways, it should not be published elsewhere.

If you don’t hear from us within one week after submission then it means your article has not been approved. Please don’t take the disapproval personally and feel offended. Once your article is approved, we will let you know the date and time it will be published.

Comments

Whitehat SEO Techniques in 2013: Learning From Blackhat SEO

The phrases “white hat” and “black hat” are loaded guns, and we only use them because they’re so ubiquitous. The reality is, when you tell yourself you are a “white hat,” you can end up fooling yourself into thinking that your strategy will habitually work, and Google will not ever turn it back on you. Worse still, you can close your brain off to insights that spectacularly improve business results. Don’t misunderstand us. Ethics are vital. If you don’t currently realise why it’s wholeheartedly vital for SEO to be crystal clear and ethical in the years going forward, take a gaze at what we composed over at seek motor Journal. (Hint: the algorithm is only a very little part of why ethics matter.) But there’s a distinction between ethics and restrictive marks, and if you aren’t discovering anything from “black hats,” you’re probably missing some key insights, like these: 1. Testing is Always Better than Blind Faith Before you head directly to the comment section and ...

Two Weeks In, Google Talks Penguin Update, Ways To Recover & Negative SEO

It’s been about two weeks since Google launched its Penguin Update . Google’s happy the new spam-fighting algorithm is improving things as intended. But some hurt by it are still wondering how to recover, and there remain concerns about “negative SEO” as a threat. I caught up with Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s web spam team, on these and some related questions. Penguin: “A Success” The goal of any algorithm update is to improve search results. So how’s Penguin been for Google? “It’s been a success from our standpoint,” Cutts said. What About Those Weird Results? Of course, soon after Penguin was released, people quickly started citing examples of odd results . The official Viagra site wasn’t listed, while hacked sites were. An empty web site was listed for “make money online,” and there were reports of other empty sites ranking well. Scraper sites were reported outranking the sites they scraped. How could Penguin be a success with these types of things happening? Cutts s...

Google Update Brewing? What Is Going On?

May 16, 2012 • 9:13 am As of yesterday, the WebmasterWorld thread and some other forums starting lighting up again with discussion and SEO chatter around Google's search results starting the shuffle and fluctuate. These are typically signs of an update happening in Google. Maybe a Panda or Penguin refresh? Maybe a new Google bug? Maybe a new penalty or an old one being run again? Maybe Google is testing an algorithm or update? Or maybe it is something completely different or people are on crack? I do not know but earlier this week, when I saw similar discussion around this, I asked Google if there was a Penguin refresh and they said no. It wasn't Penguin, Panda or anything else. So do I go back to Google and bother asking about yesterday's increase in SEO chatter? Did you notice ranking and traffic changes between Monday and today? Forum discussion at WebmasterWorld . Image credit to ShutterStock for brewing pot - I added Google logo

SEO Techniques

Search This Blog